Cardinale

Cardinale v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20242:20-cv-01325California7,093 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CONNIE A. CARDINALE, No. 2:20-cv-01325-MCE-CKD Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SCOTT R. JONES, et al., Defendants. 16 On July 1, 2020, Plaintiff Connie A. Cardinale (“Plaintiff”) initiated the present action by filing the operative Complaint against Defendants Sheriff Scott R. Jones (“Jones”), Detective Clinton Robinson (“Robinson”), County of Sacramento (the “County”), and Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department (“SCSD”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, which has been fully briefed. ECF Nos. 45 (“Pl.’s Mot.”), 50 (“Defs.’ Opp’n”), 54 (“Pl.’s Reply”). Plaintiff has also filed two Motions to Strike Defense Exhibits A and D, which Defendants oppose. ECF Nos. 51, 52, 57, 58, 59. In addition, Defendants subsequently filed their own Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 61, which Plaintiff seeks to strike as well, ECF No. 63. For the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.