Ramsey

Ramsey v. City of Rancho Cordova

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20242:23-cv-02178California4,076 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES RAMSEY, No. 2:23-cv-02178-DAD-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

14 CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, et al., (Doc. No. 7) 15 Defendants.

16 17 This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss filed on October 24, 18 2023. (Doc. No. 7.) On November 11, 2023, defendants’ motion was taken under submission on 19 the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 10.) For the reasons explained below, 20 defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted, and plaintiff will be granted leave to amend as to 21 certain of his claims. 22 BACKGROUND 23 Plaintiff Charles Ramsey brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against 24 defendants City of Rancho Cordova (the “City”), County of Sacramento (the “County”), and 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 DOES 1–25 stemming from alleged constitutional violations committed by the police during a 2 five-and-a-half-hour…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.