Ramsey

Ramsey v. City of Rancho Cordova

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20242:23-cv-02178California4,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES RAMSEY, No. 2:23-cv-02178-DAD-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, et al., (Doc. No. 7) Defendants.

16 This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss filed on October 24, 2023. (Doc. No. 7.) On November 11, 2023, defendants’ motion was taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 10.) For the reasons explained below, defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted, and plaintiff will be granted leave to amend as to certain of his claims. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Charles Ramsey brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants City of Rancho Cordova (the “City”), County of Sacramento (the “County”), and ///// ///// ///// ///// DOES 1–25 stemming from alleged constitutional violations committed by the police during a five-and-a-half-hour…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.