Zetterholm
(PC) Ramsey v. Zetterholm
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL C. RAMSEY, No. 2:24-cv-0034 KJM CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 S. ZETTERHOLM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 10, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge recommended that this 19 action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) On 20 May 7, 2024, plaintiff, “a paraplegic with limited mobility and medical complications,” filed 21 objections stating that he has been unable to respond to court orders based on his disabling 22 medical issues, his transfers to various prisons deprived him of his property on more than two 23 occasions, he “has been waiting on prison officials[’] administrative remedies for further . . . 24 evidence to present his case,” and he did not receive the findings and recommendations until 25 April 22, 2024. (ECF No. 12 at 2-3, 5.) He asks that his time to respond…