Macomber

(PS) Nible v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20242:24-cv-01259California1,158 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM LYLE NIBLE, No. 2:24-cv-01259-DJC-CSK-PC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

EMERGENCY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

14 JEFF MACOMBER, Secretary of 15 Corrections; T. Dorsey, Parole Agent; and DOES 1–100, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff William Lyle Nible brings this pro se Complaint alleging violations of his 20 federal constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Jeffrey Macomber, the 21 Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), 22 Tommee Dorsey, a Parole Agent with CDCR, and 100 Doe Defendants (together, 23 “Defendants”). Plaintiff seeks an emergency preliminary injunction against 24 Defendants, which was filed with Plaintiff’s Complaint, asking that the Court enjoin 25 Defendants from enforcing several allegedly unconstitutional conditions of parole. 26 For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Emergency 27 Preliminary Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff may re-file the Motion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.