(SS) Siqueiros v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20241:23-cv-00636California7,433 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

19 Plaintiff Vanessa Siqueiros (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 20 Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application 21 for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 22 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without 23 oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.2 24

25

26 1 On December 20, 2023, Martin O’Malley was named Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See https://www.ssa.gov/history/commissioners.html. He is therefore substituted as the defendant in this action. See 42 27 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in [their] official capacity, be the proper defendant.”). 28 2 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. (See Doc. 10). 1 II. BACKGROUND 2 Plaintiff was born on January 5, 1975. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 325). She filed a 3 claim for DIB…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.