Clendenin

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM STEPHENSON, Case No. 2:22-cv-01521-DAD-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST MOTION

TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL

14 STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., DISCOVERY, GRANTING HIS SECOND

MOTION TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL

15 Defendants. INTERROGATORIES, AND GRANTING IN

PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY

16 THE SCHEDULING ORDER 17 ECF Nos. 27, 29, & 34 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed three motions; two seeking to propound additional 20 interrogatories and one seeking to modify the scheduling order. Defendants have filed 21 oppositions to plaintiff’s motions for additional interrogatories. Because I find that plaintiff has 22 not adequately supported his first request for additional interrogatories, I will deny that motion. I 23 will, however, grant his second motion for additional interrogatories and grant in part his motion 24 to modify the scheduling…