Clendenin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM STEPHENSON, Case No. 2:22-cv-01521-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST MOTION

TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL

STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., DISCOVERY, GRANTING HIS SECOND

MOTION TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL

Defendants. INTERROGATORIES, AND GRANTING IN

PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY

THE SCHEDULING ORDER ECF Nos. 27, 29, & 34 18 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed three motions; two seeking to propound additional interrogatories and one seeking to modify the scheduling order. Defendants have filed oppositions to plaintiff’s motions for additional interrogatories. Because I find that plaintiff has not adequately supported his first request for additional interrogatories, I will deny that motion. I will, however, grant his second motion for additional interrogatories and grant in part his motion to modify the scheduling…