(PC) Black v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20242:24-cv-00811California2,011 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SIVA D. BLACK, No. 2:24-cv-0811 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 UNITED STATES, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Siva D. Black proceeds without counsel and seeks federal intervention into state 18 proceedings and a range of injunctive relief. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local 19 Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s complaint is before the court for screening. (ECF 20 No. 1.) The complaint’s allegations do not state a claim. Because it clearly appears leave to 21 amend would be futile, the complaint should be dismissed without leave to amend. Plaintiff’s 22 motion for an immediate temporary injunction should be denied. 23 I. In Forma Pauperis 24 Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 2, 8.) However, the certificate 25 portion of the request which must be completed by plaintiff’s institution of incarceration has not 26 been filled out. Also, plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.