Tapia

(PC) Boone v. Tapia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20241:20-cv-01281California5,903 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMANUEL LEWIS BOONE, Case No. 1:20-cv-01281-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S SUR-

v. REPLY (ECF No. 32) TAPIA, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants. GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: EXHAUSTION

(ECF No. 26) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I. Background Plaintiff Emanuel Lewis Boone (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Tapia and Felix for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, Defendants Arroyo and Jimenez for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and Defendants Tapia, Arroyo, and Jimenez for violation of the Due Process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.