Tapia
(PC) Boone v. Tapia
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMANUEL LEWIS BOONE, Case No. 1:20-cv-01281-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S SUR-
13 v. REPLY (ECF No. 32) 14 TAPIA, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
15 Defendants. GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: EXHAUSTION
16 (ECF No. 26) 17 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 I. Background 21 Plaintiff Emanuel Lewis Boone (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 22 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 23 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Tapia and Felix for excessive force in 24 violation of the Eighth Amendment, Defendants Arroyo and Jimenez for failure to protect in 25 violation of the Eighth Amendment, and Defendants Tapia, Arroyo, and Jimenez for violation of 26 the Due Process…