Biden

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID BENNETT, No. 2:23-cv-00619-DAD-AC (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT

14 JOE BIDEN, (Doc. No. 22) 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner David Bennett is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 25, 2024, the court dismissed and closed this action due to petitioner’s failure to 21 state a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. (Doc. No. 20.) In particular, the court 22 explained that “[t]he petition is largely unintelligible, but it appears to allege a litany of 23 constitutional rights violations and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act stemming 24 from competency proceedings in petitioner’s criminal case.” (Id. at 1.) That same day, judgment 25 was entered. (Doc. No. 21.) 26…