Biden
(HC) Bennett v. Biden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BENNETT, No. 2:23-cv-00619-DAD-AC (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION
TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT
JOE BIDEN, (Doc. No. 22) Respondent. 16 Petitioner David Bennett is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 25, 2024, the court dismissed and closed this action due to petitioner’s failure to state a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. (Doc. No. 20.) In particular, the court explained that “[t]he petition is largely unintelligible, but it appears to allege a litany of constitutional rights violations and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act stemming from competency proceedings in petitioner’s criminal case.” (Id. at 1.) That same day, judgment was entered. (Doc. No. 21.) 26…