Escobedo

Escobedo v. Sharma

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20241:24-cv-00419California208 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ? || JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:24-cv-00419-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY Vv. DISMISSAL RAJEEV SHARMA, et al., (ECF No. 10) Defendants. 14 On May 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice voluntarily dismissing this action pursuant to 16 || Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).! (ECF No. 10). Therefore, this action has been 17 |) terminated. Fed. R. Civ. P. A4l(a)(1)(A)G); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir, 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending 19 |! deadlines and then to close the case. 20 || IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 . . Dated: _ May 14, 2024 □□□ heey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 ' The notice does not state whether the dismissal is with or without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.