Mendoza

(PC) Venegas v. Mendoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20241:21-cv-00962California2,404 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SALVADOR VENEGAS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00962-DAD-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER AS TO

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AGAINST

9 DEFENDANT NAVARRO

10 v. Motions to Compel: July 15, 2024

11 Exhaustion Motion: August 19, 2024

12 Non-expert

E. MENDOZA, et al., Discovery: September 16, 2024

13 Defendant(s). Dispositive Motions: November 15, 2024 14 15 On February 23, 2024, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to submit scheduling 16 and discovery statements regarding Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Navarro. (ECF No. 100). 17 On March 20, 2024, Defendants filed their scheduling and discovery statement. (ECF No. 104). Defendants indicate they “do not intend to conduct formal discovery concerning the claims 18 asserted against Defendant Navarro, as these issues were sufficiently addressed in discovery 19 completed prior to Navarro’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.