Warden
(HC) Morales-Ramirez v. Warden
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIEGO MORALES-RAMIREZ, Case No. 2:23-cv-01575-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
14 WARDEN, TO THIS MATTER 15 Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 THAT THE PETITION BE DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
17 PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH COURT ORDERS AND THAT
18 RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BE
DENIED AS MOOT
19 ECF No. 8 20
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
21 DAYS 22 23 On February 6, 2024, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 8. On April 4, 2024, 24 after petitioner failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one days, 25 I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for 26 his failure to prosecute. ECF No. 9. I…