Warden

(HC) Morales-Ramirez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20242:23-cv-01575California492 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIEGO MORALES-RAMIREZ, Case No. 2:23-cv-01575-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

14 WARDEN, TO THIS MATTER 15 Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 THAT THE PETITION BE DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

17 PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH COURT ORDERS AND THAT

18 RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BE

DENIED AS MOOT

19 ECF No. 8 20

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

21 DAYS 22 23 On February 6, 2024, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 8. On April 4, 2024, 24 after petitioner failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one days, 25 I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for 26 his failure to prosecute. ECF No. 9. I…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.