Covello

(PC) Calderon v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20242:23-cv-02049California503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, No. 2:23-cv-2049 WBS CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. COVELLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to stay the responsive pleading deadline and plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF Nos. 44, 48.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied and defendant’s motion to stay the responsive pleading deadline is granted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 44) The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.