Covello
(PC) Calderon v. Covello
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, No. 2:23-cv-2049 WBS CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. COVELLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to stay the responsive pleading deadline and plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF Nos. 44, 48.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied and defendant’s motion to stay the responsive pleading deadline is granted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 44) The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…