Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Trans Union, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20241:24-cv-00124California373 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CARMEN RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00124-SAB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS

13 v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE

SCHEDULING REPORT

14 TRANS UNION, LLC,

MAY 17, 2024 DEADLINE

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 The initial scheduling conference in this matter was initially set for May 14, 2024. (ECF 19 No. 4.) On May 3, 2024, the Court issued an order continuing the scheduling conference to May 20 21, 2024. (ECF No. 8.) Pursuant to the order setting the mandatory scheduling conference, the 21 parties were ordered to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the scheduling 22 conference. (ECF No. 4 at 2.) No joint scheduling report has been filed in this action. 23 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules 24 or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 25 sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.