Phillips

(PC) Sheppard v. Phillips

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20241:24-cv-00078California1,112 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LONZO SHEPPARD, Case No. 1:24-cv-00078-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE

13 v. (ECF No. 10) 14 PHILLIPS, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

15 Defendant.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

17 ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 18 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 20 Plaintiff Lonzo Sheppard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was initiated on 22 January 17, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) 23 On May 3, 2024, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within 24 twenty-one days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative 25 remedies. (ECF No. 10.) On May 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed a response…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.