Sheehan

(PC) Trevino v. Sheehan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20242:23-cv-00235California1,107 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT TREVINO, Case No. 2:23-cv-00235-KJM-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. FINDING THAT THE AMENDED

COMPLAINT FAILS TO MEET FEDERAL

14 X. SHEEHAN, et al., PLEADING STANDARDS AND

GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

15 Defendants. ECF No. 16 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff brings this action against nine defendants, alleging that they violated his First and 20 Fourth Amendment rights, as well as various state law provisions. ECF No. 16. The complaint, 21 however, is difficult to understand and, for the reasons stated below, does not meet federal 22 pleading standards. I will give plaintiff leave to amend to better articulate his claims. 23

24 25 26

27 28 1 Screening Order 2 I. Screening and Pleading Requirements 3 A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental 4 entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable 5 claims and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.