Atchley

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH D. FAIR, JR. No. 2:20-cv-01107-TLN-DB 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 MATTHEW ATCHLEY 15 Respondent. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on pro se Petitioner Joseph Fair, Jr.’s (“Petitioner”) Motion 18 for Relief from Judgment.1 (ECF No. 35.) Respondent Matthew Atchley (“Respondent”) did not 19 file an opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 1 As discussed below, the Court construes Petitioner’s objections as a motion for relief from 28 judgment. 1 A detailed recitation of the factual and procedural history is not necessary for the 2 disposition of Petitioner’s motion. In short, Petitioner is a state prisoner challenging his criminal 3 convictions via a writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 15.) On July 14, 2023, the magistrate judge 4 made findings and recommended the Court deny Petitioner’s habeas petition for failing to meet 5 the standards set forth…