Davis

Smith v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20241:24-cv-00476California374 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CANDACE SMITH, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00476-JLT-EPG 9

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO 10

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

11 v. (ECF No. 4).

KATHY DAVIS,

12 Defendant. 13 14 15 Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint on April 22, 2024, along with an 16 application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2). The Court 17 denied Plaintiff’s application without prejudice and directed Plaintiff to submit the long-form 18 application or pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 3). On May 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed a completed application 19 requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4). 20 \\\ 21 \\\ 22 \\\ 23 \\\ 24 \\\ 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 27 28 —_—— III ITI EIEIO III III IE GID (GUERIN

| The Court finds Plaintiff has made the showing required by $1915. Accordingly, □□□□□□□□□□ □ application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) is granted.! 3 4 || IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 . . Dated: _ May 15, 2024 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.