Davis
Smith v. Davis
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CANDACE SMITH, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00476-JLT-EPG 9
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO 10
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
11 v. (ECF No. 4).
KATHY DAVIS,
12 Defendant. 13 14 15 Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint on April 22, 2024, along with an 16 application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2). The Court 17 denied Plaintiff’s application without prejudice and directed Plaintiff to submit the long-form 18 application or pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 3). On May 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed a completed application 19 requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4). 20 \\\ 21 \\\ 22 \\\ 23 \\\ 24 \\\ 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 27 28 —_—— III ITI EIEIO III III IE GID (GUERIN
| The Court finds Plaintiff has made the showing required by $1915. Accordingly, □□□□□□□□□□ □ application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) is granted.! 3 4 || IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 . . Dated: _ May 15, 2024 …