Quick

I. BACKGROUND.

22 Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on November 30, 2022. (ECF No. 23 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that the following claims should 24 proceed past the screening stage: Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against 25 defendants Quick, Garza, Garcia, Valadez, Prince, and Martinez; his Eighth Amendment failure 26 to protect claims against defendants Quick, Garza, Garcia, Valadez, Prince, and Martinez; and 27 28 1 his Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Ontiveros for deliberate indifference to his 2 serious medical needs. (Id.). 3 At the start of this case, the Court issued Informational Order, warning Plaintiff he 4 “must keep the Court and opposing parties informed of the party’s correct current address. 5 Local Rule 182(f). If a party moves to a different address without filing and serving a notice of 6 change of address, documents served at a party’s old address of record shall be deemed 7 received even if not actually received. Id.” (ECF No. 4 at 5). The Court also cautioned Plaintiff 8 that failure to follow the Court’s orders and all applicable rules “will be grounds for imposition…