(PC) Singh v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20242:23-cv-00056California854 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAGHVENDRA SINGH, also known as No. 2:23-CV-0056-DMC-P Raj Singh, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 and SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, ECF No. 9. 20 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 21 against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or 23 malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief 24 from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Moreover, 25 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require that complaints contain a “. . . short and plain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.