Stratton

Stratton v. Oroville City Elementary School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20242:23-cv-00964California6,387 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BROCK STRATTON, et al.,

11 Plaintiffs, No. 2:23-cv-00964-TLN-CSK 12 v. 13 OROVILLE CITY ELEMENTARY ORDER SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 16

17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Elizabeth Mgbam’s (“Mgbam”) Motion to 18 Dismiss and Motion to Strike. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiffs Brock Stratton (“Brock”), Nicole 19 Stratton (“Nicole”), and C.S., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem Brock Stratton 20 (“C.S.”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed oppositions. (ECF Nos. 18, 19.) Mgbam filed a reply. 21 (ECF No. 22.) 22 Also before the Court are Defendants Oroville City Elementary School District 23 (“OCESD”), Kimberly Tyler (“Tyler”), John Bettencourt (“Bettencourt”), and Spencer Holtom’s 24 (“Holtom”) (collectively, “District Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) and Motion to 25 Strike (ECF No. 12). Both motions have been fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 17, 21, 23, 26.) For the 26 reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Mgbam and District Defendants’ Motions to 27 Dismiss. (ECF Nos. 10,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.