Gomez

(PC) Merino v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20242:21-cv-00572California1,498 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 FRANCISCO MERINO, No. 2:21-cv-00572-DAD-KJN (PC) 6 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION

7 v. (ECF Nos. 204, 205) 8 GOMEZ, et al., 9 Defendants. 10

11 On October 17, 2023, the parties settled the instant action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12 1983, at a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (ECF No. 185.) 13 On October 18, 2023, the action was dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to the parties’ 14 stipulation for voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 190.) 15 On December 1, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motions to rescind the settlement 16 agreement and reopen the case. (ECF No. 201.) 17 On April 5 and April 8, 2024, Plaintiff filed motions for clarification regarding the 18 settlement funds available in his prison trust account. (ECF Nos. 204, 205.) 19 On April 10, 2024, the Court directed Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff’s motions. 20 (ECF No. 206.) On April 15, 2024, Plaintiff filed another notice regarding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.