Allen

Allen v. Summit

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20241:23-cv-01549California5,668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERROD DUPREE ALLEN, Case No. 1:23-cv-01549-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT

v. (ECF No. 1)

CORTEZ SUMMIT, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

Plaintiff Jerrad Dupree Allen (“Plaintiff”), a pre-trial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Bakersfield Police Department Officers Cortez Summit, Victor Coronado, Dominic Ramirez, Alan Guardado, and Rene Garcia. Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case at any time if the Court determines the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.