Malik

(PS) Malik v. Malik

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20242:23-cv-01344California2,860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GHAUS MALIK, No. 2:23-cv-01344 TLN CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER FARHAN MALIK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action and paid the filing fee on July 10, 2023. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) This action proceeds on the first amended complaint (“FAC”) filed August 18, 2023. (ECF No. 9.) Two defendants, Farhan and John Malik (“Malik defendants”), also proceeding pro se, have filed a motion to dismiss the FAC. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition, and the Malik defendants have replied. (ECF Nos. 20 & 28.) This motion is presently before the court. Additionally, defendants Wells Fargo and Robin Arias (“Wells Fargo defendants”) have filed a motion to compel arbitration and stay these proceedings or, alternatively, to dismiss this action. (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition, and the Wells Fargo defendants have replied. (ECF No. 37 & 38.) The court addresses this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.