Cueva

(DP) Clark v. Cueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20241:12-cv-00803California738 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4

5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 ROYAL CLARK, Case No. 1:12-cv-00803-KES

12 Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE

13 v. ORDER (1) GRANTING PETITIONER’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO

14 CHANCE ANDES, Warden of San SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT, and (2) Quentin Rehabilitation Center, DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE 15 COURT TO SUBSTITUTE THE NAME Respondent. OF WARDEN DANIEL E. CUEVA FOR 16 WARDEN CHANCE ANDES AS

NAMED RESPONDENT

17

18 19 On May 15, 2024, Petitioner Royal Clark, through appointed counsel the Office of the 20 Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California, by Assistant Federal Defender David 21 Harshaw, moved to substitute Daniel E. Cueva, Acting Warden of the California Medical 22 Facility, as the Respondent in this action in place of Chance Andes, Warden of the San Quentin 23 Rehabilitation Center (formally known as San Quentin State Prison). 24 Counsel for Petitioner advises that counsel for Respondent, Deputy Attorney General 25 William…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.