(HC) Wilson v. People of the State of California
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 JEROME WILSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00426-EPG-HC
12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
13 v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE
JUDICIAL REMEDIES AND FOR FAILURE
14 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, TO STATE A COGNIZABLE FEDERAL
15 HABEAS CLAIM Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Jerome Wilson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 I. 20 DISCUSSION 21 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires preliminary review of a 22 habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered 23 to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the 24 petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 25 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. §…