(HC) Wilson v. People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20241:24-cv-00426California1,131 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JEROME WILSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00426-EPG-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

13 v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE

JUDICIAL REMEDIES AND FOR FAILURE

14 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, TO STATE A COGNIZABLE FEDERAL

15 HABEAS CLAIM Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Jerome Wilson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 I. 20 DISCUSSION 21 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires preliminary review of a 22 habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered 23 to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the 24 petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 25 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.