Borla

(HC) Sharp v. Borla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20241:23-cv-01557California2,145 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ANDRE SHARP, Case No. 1:23-cv-01557-KES-HBK (HC) 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

13 v. DISMISS 1 14 EDWARD BORLA, WARDEN, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 Respondent. (Doc. No. 11) 16 17 18 Petitioner Anthony Andre Sharp (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner, initiated this action by 19 filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1, 20 “Petition”). In response, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) and lodged several 21 state and federal court records in support. (Doc. Nos. 11, 12). Petitioner filed an opposition to 22 the Motion to Dismiss, and Respondent filed a Reply. (Doc. Nos. 17, 18). The Court permitted 23 Petitioner to file a Sur-reply. (Doc. Nos. 24, 25). For the reasons set forth more fully below, the 24 undersigned recommends granting Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss. 25 //// 26 //// 27 1 This matter was referred to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.