(SS) Baldwin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20241:23-cv-01719California3,806 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

2 3

4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 12 JONATHAN T. BALDWIN, Case No. 1:23-cv-01719-JLT-EPG 13 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THE

14 v. DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY BE REVERSED AND

15 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

THIS CASE BE REMANDED FOR

16 Defendant. FURTHER PROCEEDINGS 17 (ECF Nos. 1, 9). 18 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an 21 unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding his 22 application for supplemental security income benefits. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (providing 23 for issuance of proposed findings of fact and recommendations); Local Rule 302(c)(17) (referring 24 final social security decisions for findings and recommendations). 25 Plaintiff argues as follows: 26 A. The ALJ opinion failed to properly analyze Plaintiff’s subjective symptom testimony.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.