Smith v. West Coast Hotel Management, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20241:24-cv-00586California669 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00586-KES-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT

13 v. PREJUDICE AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF

TO COMPLETE LONG FORM OR PAY

14 WEST COAST HOTEL MANAGEMENT, $405.00 FILING FEE

LLC., MESA UNDERWRITERS

15 SPECIALITY INSURANCE, SELECTIVE (Doc. No. 2)

INSURANCE COMPANY, SULEYKA

16 HASSAN, BRADY WOLFOLK and

MINH TRAN,

17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff proceeds in this civil action pro se. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff moves to proceed in 21 forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. No. 2). Upon review the Court finds Plaintiff’s 22 application does not contain sufficient information for the Court to determine if she is entitled to 23 proceed in this action without prepayment of fees. Although there is not set criteria, at a 24 minimum an application must state the facts as to affiant’s poverty with some particularity, 25 definiteness and certainty.” United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.