(HC) Kalso v. Butte County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20242:24-cv-00507California509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZACHARY LLOYD KALSO, No. 2:24-CV-0507-DMC-P Petitioner,

ORDER

v. and BUTTE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Respondent. 16 Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s original petition. See ECF No. 1. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. When the petition was filed, Petitioner was a pre-trial detainee in the custody of Butte County awaiting trial on various felony firearms charges. See ECF No. 1. On April 1, 2024, mail directed to Petitioner was returned undeliverable with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.