(HC) Kalso v. Butte County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20242:24-cv-00507California509 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZACHARY LLOYD KALSO, No. 2:24-CV-0507-DMC-P 12 Petitioner,

ORDER

13 v. and 14 BUTTE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s original petition. See 19 ECF No. 1. 20 Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary 21 dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits 22 annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it 23 is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. When the petition was filed, 24 Petitioner was a pre-trial detainee in the custody of Butte County awaiting trial on various felony 25 firearms charges. See ECF No. 1. On April 1, 2024, mail directed to Petitioner was returned 26 undeliverable with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.