Tate
Tate v. Wm. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAKEMA TATE, et al., individually and on Case No. 1:23-cv-01038-JLT-CDB behalf of all others similarly situated,
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF
Plaintiffs, COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND v. ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT WM. BOLTHOUSE FARMS, INC., TO RULE 41(a)(1) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendant. 16 (Doc. 31)
18 On July 12, 2023, Plaintiffs Lakema Tate and Richard Ortiz (“Plaintiffs”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint asserting claims on behalf of themselves and a putative class against Wm. Bolthouse Farms, Inc (“Defendant”). (Doc.1). On September 26, 2023, Plaintiffs filed the operative first amended class action complaint. (Doc. 15). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on October 10, 2023. (Doc. 17). On October 30, 2023, Plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss and Defendant filed a reply on…