Tate
Tate v. Wm. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAKEMA TATE, et al., individually and on Case No. 1:23-cv-01038-JLT-CDB behalf of all others similarly situated, 12
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF
Plaintiffs, 13 COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND v. ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT 14 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT WM. BOLTHOUSE FARMS, INC., TO RULE 41(a)(1) OF THE FEDERAL 15 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendant. 16 (Doc. 31) 17
18 19 On July 12, 2023, Plaintiffs Lakema Tate and Richard Ortiz (“Plaintiffs”) initiated this 20 action with the filing of a complaint asserting claims on behalf of themselves and a putative class 21 against Wm. Bolthouse Farms, Inc (“Defendant”). (Doc.1). On September 26, 2023, Plaintiffs 22 filed the operative first amended class action complaint. (Doc. 15). Defendant filed a motion to 23 dismiss on October 10, 2023. (Doc. 17). On October 30, 2023, Plaintiffs filed an opposition to 24 the motion to dismiss and Defendant filed a reply on…