(PC)Lopez

(PC)Lopez v. CDC Director

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20242:21-cv-02094California508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL LOPEZ, No. 2:21-cv-2094 DAD AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDC DIRECTOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated April 25, 2024, the district judge granted plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and vacated the judgment that was previously entered in this case. ECF No. 15. The same order referred the matter back to the undersigned for the purpose of resetting the deadline for plaintiff to file a first amended complaint. Plaintiff will be granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. In an amended complaint, plaintiff must demonstrate how the conditions about which he complains resulted in a deprivation of his constitutional rights. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 370-71 (1976). Also, the complaint must allege in specific terms how each named defendant is involved. Arnold v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.