Longardener

(PC) Martin v. Longardener

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20241:22-cv-01001California1,205 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JARED ANDREW MARTIN, No. 1:22-cv-01001-KES-GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

14 KATHERINE LONGARDENER, et al., (Doc. 11) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Martin, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated 18 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by filing a complaint on August 11, 19 2022. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On December 1, 2023, Plaintiff was mailed notice of the reassignment of this case. 22 Doc. 9. On December 7, 2023, the Postal Service returned the mailing as “Undeliverable, Not in 23 Custody.” See docket. The assigned magistrate judge initially found Plaintiff had failed to 24 exhaust administrative remedies and issued an order to show cause on December 5, 2023. 25 Doc. 10. The Post Office again returned the Court’s mailing as “Undeliverable, RTS,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.