Warden
(PC) Beeson v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAYLOR A. BEESON, No. 2:23-cv-1621 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARDEN, F.C.I. HERLONG, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action against employees of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. On September 1, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Having conducted the required screening the court finds that plaintiff may proceed on a claim for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and a claim for retaliation for protected conduct arising under the First Amendment against defendant Lt. Birtwell. At this point, plaintiff has two options: he can proceed immediately on the claims identified above or he can…