Taylor

Taylor v. Ford Motor Co

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20242:23-cv-03031California5,155 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LAUREN TAYLOR, Case No. 2:23-cv-03031-KJM-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED y STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No 14) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 15 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 17 || 14.), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 19 clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not 20 retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal., Feb. 03, 2017) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain 23 jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.