Taylor

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | LAUREN TAYLOR, Case No. 2:23-cv-03031-KJM-CSK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED 10 y STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No 14) 13 | FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 17 || 14.), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See 18 | L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 19 | clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not 20 | retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that 21 | action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 22 | (E.D. Cal., Feb. 03, 2017) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain 23 | jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the 24 | Court…