Newsom

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20242:90-cv-00520California2,074 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 | GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 As required by court order, the parties have filed a joint motion to clarify paragraph 6 of 18 | this court’s February 7, 2022 Order. See ECF No. 8217 (joint request); ECF No. 7456 (order). In 19 | that paragraph, the court discontinued “the parties’ obligation to file further annual updates to” 20 | the Program Guide! and Compendium.’ Feb. 7, 2022 Order at 4, ECF No. 7456. The parties’ 21 | request for clarification springs from defendants’ plan now to promulgate new regulations and 22 | policy changes governing Restricted Housing Units (RHUs). Defendants intend some parts of

' The Program Guide, or more formally the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) Mental Health Services Delivery System (MHSDS) Program Guide, is defendants’ plan to remedy Eighth Amendment violations in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.