BMO Bank N.A. v. Royal Road Line Inc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., Case No. 1:23-cv-01714-EPG 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED IN PART

14 ROYAL ROAD LINE INC., et al., (ECF No. 11) 15 Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

16 FOURTEEN DAYS 17 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK’S OFFICE

TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

18 19 Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A. (“Plaintiff) moves for default judgment against 20 Defendants Royal Road Line Inc. (“Royal Road”) and Nishan Singh (“Singh”) on state law 21 breach of contract claims. The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 22 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(19). For the reasons given below, the Court will recommend 23 that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be granted in part. 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 Plaintiff is a national banking association. (ECF No. 1 at 2). Defendant Royal Road…