BMO Bank N.A. v. Royal Road Line Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., Case No. 1:23-cv-01714-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED IN PART

ROYAL ROAD LINE INC., et al., (ECF No. 11) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK’S OFFICE

TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

18 Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A. (“Plaintiff) moves for default judgment against Defendants Royal Road Line Inc. (“Royal Road”) and Nishan Singh (“Singh”) on state law breach of contract claims. The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(19). For the reasons given below, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be granted in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a national banking association. (ECF No. 1 at 2). Defendant Royal Road…