Puckett

Puckett v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20242:22-cv-00350California2,052 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER 15 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 As the parties are aware, this action stems from plaintiff’s conviction for robbery and 19 murder, resulting in roughly 20 years of incarceration despite being factually innocent, allegedly 20 as a result of defendants’ withholding or ignoring exonerating evidence. (ECF No. 36 at 2.) On 21 February 16, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 83.) Pursuant to Local Rule 22 302(c)(1), the matter came before the undersigned for hearing on March 15, 2024. Attorneys 23 Hilary Soloff, Ryan Snyder, and Harrison Frahn appeared on behalf of plaintiff, who was also 24 present. (ECF No. 112.) Attorney John Whitefleet appeared on behalf of defendants. (Id.) 25 On March 20, 2024, the undersigned issued an order granting plaintiff’s motion to compel 26 and ordering the parties to file briefing addressing the award of monetary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.