Hixon
(PC) Lujan v. Hixon
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL A. LUJAN, No. 1:24-cv-00187-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 KEVIN HIXON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
15 Defendants. (ECF No. 15) 16
17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on August 31, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) 21 On March 14, 2024, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a 22 cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF 23 No. 14.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the March 14, 2024 24 order. Therefore, on April 23, 2024, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the 25 action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff has…