Knowlton
(PC) Smith v. Knowlton
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, No. 1:18-cv-00851-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, Appeal No. 24-3208 13 v. ORDER ISSUING INDICATIVE RULING
THAT THIS COURT WILL DENY
14 KNOWLTON, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
15 Defendant. (Doc. 73) 16 17 Plaintiff Lawrence Christopher Smith, a state prisoner, proceeded pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On April 17, 2024, the undersigned adopted in full the magistrate judge’s Findings and 20 Recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion for law library access and grant Defendant’s motion 21 for summary judgment (exhaustion). (Docs. 64, 71.) The action was dismissed, without 22 prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 71.) Judgment was entered the 23 same date. (Doc. 72.) 24 On May 17, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration and a notice of appeal. 25 (Docs. 73, 74.)1 The notice of appeal was processed to the…