Spangler

(PC) Bradford v. Spangler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20242:24-cv-00582California1,680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:24-cv-00582 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND G. SPANGLER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. The complaint also includes requests for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. Id. at 7-8. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons explained below, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee in full prior to proceeding any further with this action. In addition, it is recommended that plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.