Chau

(PC) Tomasini v. Chau

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20242:18-cv-00286California5,602 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL J. TOMASINI, No. 2:18-cv-00286 DAD AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JAMES CHAU, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s second amended complaint against defendants Chau, Jackson, Smith, and Ashby for Eighth Amendment claims of deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s serious medical needs between 2015 and 2017. ECF No. 16 (screening order). Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 74. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, ECF No. 76, and defendants have filed a reply. ECF No. 77. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that the motion for summary judgment be granted. ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// I. Allegations in the Unverified Second Amended Complaint1 While plaintiff was a prisoner at Mule Creek State…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.