Dayal
Dayal v. County of Kern
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 NISHI DAYAL, Case No. 1:24-cv-00039-JLT-CDB
12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY
13 v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT
14 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
15 Defendants. (Docs. 5, 12)
16 ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
MEET/CONFER AND FILE JOINT
17 REPORT
18 THREE (3)-DAY DEADLINE
19 20 On January 8, 2024, Plaintiff Nishi Dayal (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing 21 of a complaint against Defendants County of Kern, Kern County District Attorney’s Office, 22 Cynthia Zimmer, Andrea Kohler, Gina Pearl, and Kenneth Russell (“Defendants”). (Doc. 1). On 23 January 9, 2024, the Court issued civil new case documents and set an initial scheduling 24 conference for April 8, 2024, at 9:00 AM. (Doc. 5). On April 2, 2024, after the parties failed to 25 timely file a joint scheduling…