Dayal

Dayal v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20241:24-cv-00039California487 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 NISHI DAYAL, Case No. 1:24-cv-00039-JLT-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY

13 v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT

14 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

15 Defendants. (Docs. 5, 12)

16 ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

MEET/CONFER AND FILE JOINT

17 REPORT

18 THREE (3)-DAY DEADLINE

19 20 On January 8, 2024, Plaintiff Nishi Dayal (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing 21 of a complaint against Defendants County of Kern, Kern County District Attorney’s Office, 22 Cynthia Zimmer, Andrea Kohler, Gina Pearl, and Kenneth Russell (“Defendants”). (Doc. 1). On 23 January 9, 2024, the Court issued civil new case documents and set an initial scheduling 24 conference for April 8, 2024, at 9:00 AM. (Doc. 5). On April 2, 2024, after the parties failed to 25 timely file a joint scheduling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.