(HC)Brundidge

(HC)Brundidge v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20241:24-cv-00245California623 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARSENIO C. BRUNDIDGE, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0245 JLT HBK (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING FIRST v. ) AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF ) HABEAS CORPUS, AND DIRECTING CLERK B.M. TRATE, Warden, ) OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE ) Respondent. ) (Docs. 8, 9) ) ) Arsenio C. Brundidge, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 8.) The assigned magistrate judge conducted a preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and found the Court lacks jurisdiction. (Doc. 9 at 2-4.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Court dismiss the first amended petition. (Id. at 4.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 9 at 4-5.) The Court advised him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.