(HC)Brundidge
(HC)Brundidge v. Trate
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARSENIO C. BRUNDIDGE, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0245 JLT HBK (HC) ) 12 Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING FIRST 13 v. ) AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF ) HABEAS CORPUS, AND DIRECTING CLERK 14 B.M. TRATE, Warden, ) OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE ) 15 Respondent. ) (Docs. 8, 9) ) 16 ) 17 Arsenio C. Brundidge, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a first amended petition 18 for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 8.) The assigned magistrate judge 19 conducted a preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and 20 found the Court lacks jurisdiction. (Doc. 9 at 2-4.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended 21 the Court dismiss the first amended petition. (Id. at 4.) 22 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner and notified him that 23 any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 9 at 4-5.) The Court advised him…