(SS) Zamora v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20241:23-cv-01405California457 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAXIMILLIANO LORENZO ZAMORA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01405-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND

13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE1

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

15 SECURITY, (Doc. No. 21)

16 Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17 (Doc. No. 16) 18

19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed May 20, 2024. (Doc. 20 No. 21). Plaintiff Maximilliano Lorenzo Zamora and the Commissioner of Social Security agree 21 that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 22 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). 23 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 24 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 25 26 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.