Cordova

Cordova v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20241:24-cv-00482California625 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ZENAIDA CORDOVA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00482-JLT-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER IMPOSING DAILY SANCTION OF $50

PER DAY FOR FAILURE TO SHOW CAUSE IN

13 v. WRITING WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT

ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE NOTICE

14 GREG RODRIGUEZ, et al., WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 5, 6)

16 DEADLINE: CLOSE OF BUSINESS 17 18 On April 23, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this action against Defendants Greg 19 Rodriguez and Michael Pallares. (ECF No. 1.) The Court’s review of the complaint suggested 20 that this case may be related to other actions pending in this district. On April 26, 2024, the Court 21 issued an order requiring Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 123 and file a notice of related cases 22 or, alternatively, a notice explaining why the action should not be related no later than May 10, 23 2024. (ECF No. 5.) The deadline expired, and Plaintiff did not file the required notice nor 24 requested an extension of time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.