Livingston

Livingston v. Leupold & Stevens

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20242:23-cv-00090California1,043 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY LIVINGSTON, No. 2:23-CV-0090-KJM-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 LEUPOLD & STEVENS, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to compel discovery. See ECF No. 18. 19 Upon Defendant’s failure to file an opposition to the motion, the matter was submitted on the 20 papers without oral argument. See ECF No. 21 (minute order). 21 The purpose of discovery is to "remove surprise from trial preparation so the 22 parties can obtain evidence necessary to evaluate and resolve their dispute." United States v. 23 Chapman Univ., 245 F.R.D. 646, 648 (C.D. Cal. 2007) (quotation and citation omitted). Rule 24 26(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure offers guidance on the scope of discovery 25 permitted:

26 Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged information that is relevant to any party's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.