Unknown

(HC) Grayson v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20242:23-cv-02861California526 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LIQUAN S. GRAYSON, No. 2:23-cv-2861-TLN-DMC 12 Petitioner,

ORDER

13 v. 14 UNKNOWN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus 18 under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On March 11, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 6.) The time to file objections passed, and the parties 23 did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 Court conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.