Cordoza

Smith v. Cordoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20241:24-cv-00200California1,436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00200-KES-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. (Doc. 6) ALEXA CORDOZA,

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Candace Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil action on February 14, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On April 8, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted her leave to amend within thirty (30) days. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on May 16, 2024, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 6.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.