Valdez
(PC) Spencer v. Valdez
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD B. SPENCER, No. 1:23-cv-00357-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
13 v. (ECF No. 30) 14 L. VALDEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendants 19 Parra and Valdez. 20 On April 29, 2024, Defendants filed a motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis 21 status. (ECF No. 29.) 22 On May 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed to stay Defendants’ motion to revoke his in forma 23 pauperis status pending the appeals in Spencer v. Milan, No. 1:20-cv-00682 JLT GSA (E.D. 24 Cal.), Spencer v. Jasso, No. 1:20-cv-00909 JLT GSA (E.D. Cal.), Spencer v. Pulido-Esparza, No. 25 1:20-cv-01176 JLT GSA (E.D. Cal.), and Spencer v. Barajas, No. 1:23-cv-01033 JLT GSA (E.D. 26 Cal.) (ECF No. 30). On May 21, 2024, Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to 27 …