Valdez

(PC) Spencer v. Valdez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20241:23-cv-00357California633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD B. SPENCER, No. 1:23-cv-00357-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

v. (ECF No. 30) L. VALDEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendants Parra and Valdez. On April 29, 2024, Defendants filed a motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. (ECF No. 29.) On May 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed to stay Defendants’ motion to revoke his in forma pauperis status pending the appeals in Spencer v. Milan, No. 1:20-cv-00682 JLT GSA (E.D. Cal.), Spencer v. Jasso, No. 1:20-cv-00909 JLT GSA (E.D. Cal.), Spencer v. Pulido-Esparza, No. 1:20-cv-01176 JLT GSA (E.D. Cal.), and Spencer v. Barajas, No. 1:23-cv-01033 JLT GSA (E.D. Cal.) (ECF No. 30). On May 21, 2024, Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.